Author Interview: Weitter Duckss

Author Interview: Weitter Duckss

Who are you, in a few lines?

(ENGLISH) I am an independent researcher and a family man, or rather vice versa. I like reading and keeping up with a wide span of different areas. Basically, I am a researcher. Astrophysics is my hobby and preoccupation. I want to know the truth that is based on hard and verifiable evidence. When presenting it, I am direct and independent of any authority or institution. I seek evidence only. A nice story can always be told with evidence and without the need to grovel to anyone.

(CROATIAN) Neovisni istraživač i obiteljski čovjek, možda prije obratno. Volim čitati i pratiti široki spektar različitih oblasti. Ipak sam u osnovi istraživač. Astrofizika je moj hobi i preokupacija. Želim znati istinu koja se temelji na čvrstim i provjerljivim dokazima. U iznošenju istine sam direktan i neovisan o bilo kakvom autoritetu ili instituciji. Samo dokazi. Lijepu priču, uvijek možete ispričati koristeći dokaze, bez podilaženja (bilo komu).

A perfect day starts with...? And ends with...?

(ENGLISH) A perfect day starts with my grandchildren having breakfast before I take them to school. It ends in the evening; after I have returned Leon home from a playground, I stay up and follow the discussions on portals and news from astronomy and astrophysics, having my earphones on and listening to classical music. Then I find myself alone in another (my own) world.

(CROATIAN) Doručkom sa unucima, prije no što ih odvedem u školu. Kada Leona navečer vratim kući sa igrališta, ostanem uz rasprave na portalima i novosti iz astronomije i astrofizike, sa klasikom u slušalicama. Tada sam sam u svome (drugom) svijetu.

When did you first realize you wanted to be a writer?

(ENGLISH) A writer? I have liked writing, making sketches and verifying facts since my school age. Besides poetry I also used to like short stories, texts consisting only of a few pages but filled with emotions, monologues and dialogues.

(CROATIAN) Književnik? Volim pisati, skicirati i provjeravati od rane školske dobi. Uz poeziju volio sam kratke tekstove (crtice) od nekoliko stranica, koji su nabijeni emocijama, monolozima i dijalozima.

Who is your favourite author and why?

(ENGLISH) I was very young when I was reading Dostoevsky, Sholokhov, Yesenin, Lorca, Cronin, Balzac, Castaneda, etc. I prefer a particular piece of art to a whole opus of an author. Nowadays, when reading a scientific article, I only memorize doubtless evidence.

(CROATIAN) Iako sam rano pročitao Dostojevskog, Šolahova, Jesenjina, Lorku, Kronina, Balzaka, Kastanedu itd, itd, draže mi je neko djelo nego cijeli opus pojedinog autora. Danas uglavnom, unutar znanstvenih članaka, memoriram samo nedvojbene dokaze.

Your latest book is "The Universe is Rotating, after all = Svemir, ipak se vrti". What is the significance of the title?

(ENGLISH) In providing evidence for the rotation of Universe and the processes within it, the anecdote of Galileo Galilei and his Eppur si muove! (And yet it moves!) worked nicely for the title.

I have never been a supporter of an abrupt, explosive and devastating final overview of Universe, which is only a copy of the Biblical story and at the same time it alludes to the showing off the power, due to the possession of nuclear weapons.

(CROATIAN) U dokazivanju rotacije svemira i procesa unutar svemira, zgodno je poslužila anegdota o Galileju “.. ipak se vrti”.

Nikad nisam bio pobornik naprasnog, eksplozivnog i rušilačkog konačnog prikaza svemira, koje nije ništa drugo do preslik biblije i istovremeno podsjeća na pokazivanje moći, uslijed posjedovanja atomskog naoružanja.

What is the message of the book?

(ENGLISH) Neither life nor Universe is static. There are no laws of nature that do not belong to physics. Although everything is uncertain due to a large quantity of bodies, objects and events, everything can regardless of that be anticipated, estimated and calculated. Beauty is in the real evidence, which shed the light of truth on our mind, as opposed to the fabricated constructions and forcefully imposed manipulating lies, which turned astrophysics into a place of sensational false news, incompetent and false constructions, impossible events, etc.

Visible matter originates, it grows by merger and gathers up (Universe consists of H=~90%, He=~10%, all the other elements are in traces and make up to 2 %). A significant quantity of matter in the same place creates strong force of attraction that gathers material from the surrounding space faster. The process of matter merger and gathering up creates slower and faster rotation. Rotation creates systems and puts them in order; together with the quantity of mass and material in the surrounding space it determines the level of the objects’ temperatures; the number of objects in an orbit; binary systems; the clusters of stars; galaxies and the clusters of galaxies; …

I am generally completely alone and far from the mainstream in my research. The asteroid of 1I/2017 U1 and the comet of 2I/Borisov were discovered two years after my article.

“One object becomes a nova and a large number (millions) of others with the same parameters just go on the same way.

Within the growth of an object, some smaller object is starting a reaction when colliding with a star. If that should remain a rare event, it needs to be a specific event under the specific conditions. The only possible specificity is for that object (the errant objects, incoming from outside the Solar system) to arrive vertically onto one of the poles and to hit the opening of a cyclone that exists on the poles of stars. That way, it would get an opportunity to break into the interior of an object. Comet ISON is the evidence that objects with vertical trajectories really exist in the Universe.”

(CROATIAN) U životu i svemiru nema statičnosti, nema zakona izvan fizike, iako je sve neizvjesno uslijed velikog broja tijela, objekata i događaja, sve se može predvidjeti, procijeniti i izračunati. Ljepota je u stvarnim dokazima, koji istinom obasjavaju um, nasuprot izmišljenih konstrukcija i na silu uguranih manipulirajućih laži, koje su astrofiziku pretvorile u mjesto lažnih senzacija, nestručnih i neistinitih konstrukcija, nemogućih događaja etc.

Materija (vidljiva) nastaje, udruživanjem raste i okuplja se (U svemiru ima: H=~90%, He=~10%, svi ostali elementi u tragovima, najviše do 2 %). Više materije na jednom mjestu stvara snažnije privlačne sile koje brže prikupljaju materijal i okolnog prostora. Proces udruživanja i spajanja materije stvara sporiju i bržu rotaciju. Rotacija stvara i uređuje sustave, određuje (uz veličinu mase i materijala u okruženju) visinu temperature tijela, broj tijela u orbiti, binarne sustave, klastere zvijezda, galaksija i klastera galaksija…

U istraživanju sam često vrlo usamljen i udaljen od glavne struje. Dvije godine poslije moga članka otkriveni su predmeti asteroid 1I/2017 U1 i comet 2I/Borisov.

“One object becomes a nova and a large number (millions) of others with the same parameters just go on the same way.

Within the growth of an object, some smaller object is starting a reaction when colliding with a star. If that should remain a rare event, it needs to be a specific event under the specific conditions. The only possible specificity is for that object (the errant objects, incoming from outside the Solar system) to arrive vertically onto one of the poles and to hit the opening of a cyclone that exists on the poles of stars. That way, it would get an opportunity to break into the interior of an object. Comet ISON is the evidence that objects with vertical trajectories really exist in the Universe.”

Are there any secrets from the book (that aren’t in the blurb), you can share with your readers?

(ENGLISH) There is only an open secret, just as it is written in the book: ” the author of this article disagrees with the current estimates of the stars’ mass, as he claims they are the product of old hypotheses which lacked enough evidence to support them. The author suggests that a radius be equal to a mass when discussing slowly-rotating stars and that the mass decrease up to 100% with fast-rotating stars etc”.

Without currently acknowledged evidence, further explanation of this subject matter is impossible at the moment, because the book would seem obscure and a fantasy. However, I have compensated for this lack with a constant presentation of evidence that oppose to each other so that a reader would be able to realize the illogicalities and inconsistencies in the statements of the contemporary scientific mainstream. Here is one of many such examples:

The mainstream states the objects below 13 M of Jupiter are unable to start the processes that create warmth and light. Contrary to that statement, I present the acknowledged evidence that expose the real truth, which is impossible to fit into contemporary presentations of astrophysics.

 

PlanetMass of JupiterTemperature KDistance AU
1GQ Lupi b1-362 650 ± 100100
2ROXs 42Bb91 950-2,000157
3HD 106906 b111.800~650
4CT Chamaeleontis b10,5-172.500440
5DH Tauri b12 (8-22) (11)2 750330
6HD 4462713-141 600-2.400275
7HR 8799 d71 09024
8HR 8799 c71 09038
9Oph 11 B212 478243

and

StarMass Sun 1Radius Sun 1Temperature °K
1R Cygni Cool giant/2.200
2CW Leonis0,7 – 0,97002.200
3IK Tauri1451-5072.100
4W Aquilae1,04-3430-4731.800 (2250-3175)
5T Cephei1.5-1.8329 +70 -502.400
6S Pegasi 1,8459-5742.107
7Chi Cygni2,1 +1,5 -0,7348-4802.441-2.742
8R Leporis2,5 – 5400±902.245-2.290
9R Leonis Minoris 10,18569±1462.648
10S Cassiopeiaeloss at 3.5 x 10-6 MSun per year9301.800

and

Brown dwarf (& planets)Mass of JupiterTemperature °KPlanets orbit AU
Mass up to 13 M Jup/(vs) Mass above 13M Jup
1ROXs 42Bb91.950 ± 100157
254 Piscium B50810±50
3DH Tauri b122.750330
4ULAS J133553.45+113005.215 -31500 -550
5OTS 4411,51.700 – 2.300
6Epsilon Indi Ba and Bb40 – 60 (28±7)1.300-1400 (880-940)1.500 (between 2,1)
72MASS J2126-814013,3 (± 1,7)1.8006.900
8Gliese 570~50750 – 8001.500
Mass vs Mass
92M 0441449.8±1.81.80015 ± 0.6
10DT Virginis8.5 ± 2.5695±601.168
11Teide 157± 152.600±150
12Epsilon Indi Ba and Bb40 – 60 (28±7)1.300-1400 (880-940)1.500 (between 2,1)
13B Tauri FU152.375700
14DENIS J081730.0-61552015950

 

(CROATIAN) Samo javna tajna, kao što je napisano u knjizi “autor se ne slaže sa današnjim procjenama mase zvijezda jer drži da su one proizvod starih hipoteza koje za podlogu nisu imale dovoljno dokaza na raspolaganju. Autor predlaže da radijus bude jednak masi, kod zvijezda spore rotacije i da se masa u brzo rotirajućim zvijezdama povećava najviše do 100 %  i td”.

U ovome trenutku nije moguće obrazlagati ovu materiju bez trenutno prihvaćenih dokaza, jer bi knjiga bila nečitljiva i djelovala bi kao fantastika. Ipak ovaj nedostatak sam kompenzirao stalnim postavljanjem dokaza koji su suprostavljeni jedni drugima da čitatelj shvati nelogičnosti i nedosljednosti tvrdnji današnje glavne struje znanosti.

Jedan primjer iz mnogih: Glavna struja tvrdi da tijela ispod 13 masa Jupitera ne mogu pokrenuti procese koji proizvode toplotu i svjetlost. Tome podatku suprostavljam prihvaćene dokaze koji otkrivaju stvarnu istinu, ona se ne može uklopiti unutar današnjih prezentacija unutar astrofizike.

 

How was the publishing experience like? Describe Generis Publishing in a few words.

(ENGLISH) I have been meeting all sorts of situations during the time of publishing my articles. I would quite rarely meet a renowned publisher that is without prejudices and a hard conservative (i.e., obsolete and unscientific) policy.

Generis Publishing was a refreshment of the kind and an example of a good, stress-free work, a very positive experience and a motivation for my further work.

(CROATIAN) U objavljivanju članaka susreo sam se sa svim i svačim. Rijetko sam susretao renomiranog izdavača bez predrasuda i tvrde konzervativne (vrlo zastarjele i neznanstvene) politike.

Generis Publishing je bio osvježenje i primjer dobrog posla bez stresa, jedno vrlo pozitivno iskustvo i podstrek za daljni rad.